ICACSIS Policies 

Type of peer review 

ICACSIS employs double-blind reviews, where both the reviewer and author remain anonymous throughout the process.

How is the reviewer selected? 

Reviewers are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for reviewers from the author though these recommendations may or may not be used.

Reviewers are Asked to Evaluate whether the Manuscript: 

  • Is original;
  • Is methodologically sound;
  • Follows appropriate ethical guidelines;
  • Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions;
  • Correctly references previous relevant work.

Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer-review process.

Decision of the manuscript 

A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the reviewers and may include verbatim comments by the reviewers.

Director’s Decision is Final 

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

No Show Policy 

Papers that are not presented in the conference will not be included in the final Proceeding.